Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Jordanians

Tohono O'odham

Exceptional
Tragic
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Jordanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,125,523 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 97.5 Tohono O'odham.
Jordanian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($109,865 compared to $72,193, a difference of 52.2%), per capita income ($45,605 compared to $30,256, a difference of 50.7%), and median household income ($91,794 compared to $61,663, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $45,248, a difference of 14.5%), wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $33,205, a difference of 24.9%).
Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricJordanianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,605
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,865
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,794
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,632
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,500
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,464
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,796
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,186
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,376
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,313
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
22.1%

Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 150.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 132.6%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 119.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.7%), single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 62.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 64.7%).
Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricJordanianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
21.5%

Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 109.6%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 105.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 96.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%).
Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJordanianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%

Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.1%).
Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJordanianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.4%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
75.1%

Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 74.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 74.6%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJordanianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
65.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
49.8%

Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 83.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.87%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.9%).
Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJordanianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.6%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 70.1%), bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 68.5%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricJordanianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.4%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.0%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.2%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 94.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 65.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 23.1%).
Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricJordanianTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%