Pima vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Tohono O'odham

Poor
Tragic
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,140,636 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 16.0 Tohono O'odham.
Pima Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Pima vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $69,068, a difference of 19.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $45,248, a difference of 13.8%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $72,193, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $73,774, a difference of 0.56%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $30,256, a difference of 1.3%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $61,663, a difference of 2.6%).
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricPimaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
22.1%

Pima vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 49.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.2%).
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
21.5%

Pima vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 76.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
8.9%

Pima vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.96%).
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Tragic
75.1%

Pima vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.3%), single father households (4.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (35.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
49.8%

Pima vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.5%).
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Pima vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Pima vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 106.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricPimaTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.1%