Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uganda

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,060,777 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.083% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to a decrease of 83.2 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $30,256, a difference of 48.9%), median family income ($106,188 compared to $72,193, a difference of 47.1%), and median household income ($87,553 compared to $61,663, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $45,248, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $33,205, a difference of 22.7%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UgandaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,043
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,188
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,553
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,041
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,064
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,739
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,374
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,698
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,584
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,976
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 124.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 116.2%), and male poverty (11.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 93.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 31.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 48.9%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 52.1%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UgandaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 104.4%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 89.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 89.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.3%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UgandaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 25.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UgandaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.2%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 63.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 60.4%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (62.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UgandaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Good
3.23
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 56.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 9.9%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UgandaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.0%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 77.2%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 71.4%), and bachelor's degree (40.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UgandaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.7%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 58.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.2%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UgandaTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%