French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

French Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

French Canadians

Tohono O'odham

Average
Tragic
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in French Canadian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,669,983 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 33.4 Tohono O'odham.
French Canadian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $30,256, a difference of 42.1%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $72,193, a difference of 40.8%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $39,543, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $33,205, a difference of 15.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $45,248, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $49,121, a difference of 18.0%).
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricFrench CanadianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,003
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,634
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,810
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,026
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,722
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,436
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,672
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,694
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,093
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,975
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
22.1%

French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 164.1%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 150.6%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 117.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.6%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 39.7%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 47.7%).
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricFrench CanadianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
21.5%

French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 97.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 96.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFrench CanadianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%

French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 39.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.9%).
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFrench CanadianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.3%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Tragic
75.1%

French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 60.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 51.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.4%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.2%).
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFrench CanadianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.07
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.8%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
49.8%

French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 99.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.27%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.2%).
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFrench CanadianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Excellent
6.6%

French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.1%), bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 45.9%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%).
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricFrench CanadianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.2%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.9%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 51.9%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.0%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.0%).
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricFrench CanadianTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.0%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%