French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
French Canadian
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
French Canadians
Tohono O'odham
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in French Canadian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,669,983 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 33.4 Tohono O'odham.
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $30,256, a difference of 42.1%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $72,193, a difference of 40.8%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $39,543, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $33,205, a difference of 15.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $45,248, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $49,121, a difference of 18.0%).
Income Metric | French Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Fair $43,003 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,634 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,810 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Fair $46,026 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,722 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,436 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,672 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,694 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $99,093 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,975 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 22.1% |
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 164.1%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 150.6%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 117.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.6%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 39.7%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 47.7%).
Poverty Metric | French Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 97.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 96.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | French Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.8% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 8.9% |
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 39.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | French Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.0% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.1% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.5% | Tragic 75.1% |
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 60.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 51.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.4%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.2%).
Family Structure Metric | French Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.07 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 49.8% |
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 99.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.27%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | French Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.9% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Excellent 6.6% |
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.1%), bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 45.9%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%).
Education Level Metric | French Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.8% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.9% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
French Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 51.9%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.0%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.0%).
Disability Metric | French Canadian | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.0% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.1% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.1% |