Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Tohono O'odham

Poor
Tragic
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,753,821 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 32.4 Tohono O'odham.
Ecuadorian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $30,256, a difference of 38.7%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $61,663, a difference of 33.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $69,068, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $49,121, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $33,205, a difference of 17.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricEcuadorianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
22.1%

Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 89.3%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 80.5%), and poverty (14.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 21.6%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 33.4%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 39.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
21.5%

Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 65.3%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 64.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.9%

Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
75.1%

Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 60.2%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 49.8%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.77%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
49.8%

Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.4%), no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 34.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
6.6%

Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 44.9%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 44.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (90.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and 9th grade (91.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.75%).
Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 100.0%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 66.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 19.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%