Russian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Russian
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Russians
Tohono O'odham
8,595
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
62nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Russian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,189,324 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.179% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 179.4 Tohono O'odham.
Russian vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $30,256, a difference of 75.7%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $72,193, a difference of 66.9%), and median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $39,543, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $45,248, a difference of 20.2%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $33,205, a difference of 33.0%).
Income Metric | Russian | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $53,154 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,487 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,008 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,334 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,939 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,169 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,389 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $110,398 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,328 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,626 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Russian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 173.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 159.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 134.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 33.8%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 57.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 58.9%).
Poverty Metric | Russian | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.3% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.6% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 21.5% |
Russian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 99.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 92.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 89.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Russian | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.9% |
Russian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Russian | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.9% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.7% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.8% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 75.1% |
Russian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 90.6%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 77.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 72.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households (63.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Russian | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.2% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.12 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 49.8% |
Russian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Russian | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.8% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Excellent 6.6% |
Russian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 122.5%), master's degree (19.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 101.4%), and bachelor's degree (45.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Education Level Metric | Russian | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.5% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.5% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.1% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.2% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.3% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Russian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 70.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 64.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.3%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.4%).
Disability Metric | Russian | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |