Immigrants from Moldova vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,245,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 24.7 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $30,256, a difference of 57.0%), median family income ($109,975 compared to $72,193, a difference of 52.3%), and median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $39,543, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 18.3%), householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $45,248, a difference of 24.1%), and median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $33,205, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 164.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 139.3%), and male poverty (9.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 130.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 44.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 60.5%), and single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 63.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 105.6%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 98.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 92.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 82.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 79.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.35%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 59.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 71.2%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 71.2%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 58.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.5%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 19.5%).