Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sri Lankans

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,504,078 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Tohono O'odham.
Sri Lankan Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,093 compared to $61,663, a difference of 51.0%), median family income ($108,234 compared to $72,193, a difference of 49.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $69,068, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 16.6%), median female earnings ($40,496 compared to $33,205, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $45,248, a difference of 22.6%).
Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricSri LankanTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,014
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,234
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,093
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,040
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,136
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,496
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,470
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,960
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,270
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,201
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
22.1%

Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 141.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 121.1%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 115.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 54.7%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 55.5%), and single mother poverty (26.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 61.2%).
Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricSri LankanTohono O'odham
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
21.5%

Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 101.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 95.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 95.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.1%).
Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSri LankanTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%

Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.4%).
Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSri LankanTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
75.1%

Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 72.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 62.5%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.53, a difference of 5.4%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSri LankanTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Tragic
49.8%

Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 105.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 24.9%).
Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSri LankanTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.5%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.0%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 56.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 51.7%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.0% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.50%), 9th grade (93.2% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and 7th grade (94.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.68%).
Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricSri LankanTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.2%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 64.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 17.0%).
Sri Lankan vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricSri LankanTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.5%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%