Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Tohono O'odham

Exceptional
Tragic
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,957,562 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.181% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 181.4 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $30,256, a difference of 69.8%), median family income ($118,053 compared to $72,193, a difference of 63.5%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $39,543, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $45,248, a difference of 21.6%), wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $33,205, a difference of 30.4%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 182.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 159.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 145.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 43.8%), single mother poverty (25.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 70.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 74.3%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 97.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 95.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 95.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 21.9%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 102.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 79.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 73.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.6%), family households (63.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 59.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 11.7%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 95.9%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 90.5%), and bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 75.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 74.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 26.4%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%