Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Guatemala
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Guatemala

Tohono O'odham

Poor
Tragic
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,043,748 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 9.0 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $30,256, a difference of 24.1%), median household income ($75,123 compared to $61,663, a difference of 21.8%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $72,193, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $33,205, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $49,121, a difference of 9.8%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,550
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,191
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,123
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,851
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,244
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,444
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,447
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,341
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,573
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,950
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 70.6%), male poverty (14.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 63.3%), and poverty (15.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 27.1%), single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 32.5%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.6%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 80.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 76.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.1%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 33.0%), single father households (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 27.8%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.5%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.7%), bachelor's degree (30.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (77.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.54%), 12th grade, no diploma (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and high school diploma (81.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.84%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.4%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.4%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.8%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.7%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.1%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 78.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.8%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaTohono O'odham
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.1%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%