Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Tohono O'odham

Poor
Tragic
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,727,949 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.060% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 60.1 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,195 compared to $30,256, a difference of 36.2%), median household income ($80,341 compared to $61,663, a difference of 30.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $69,068, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $49,121, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $33,205, a difference of 16.4%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 83.5%), male poverty (12.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 77.1%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.7%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 35.0%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 37.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 63.9%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 63.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 58.5%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 47.7%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 56.5%), no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 40.7%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 42.2%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 40.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.33%), 9th grade (91.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 95.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 68.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 19.6%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%