Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,060,903 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 27.3 Tohono O'odham.
Brazilian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $30,256, a difference of 54.3%), median family income ($106,942 compared to $72,193, a difference of 48.1%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $61,663, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $45,248, a difference of 20.1%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $33,205, a difference of 21.9%).
Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricBrazilianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
22.1%

Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 137.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 123.3%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 112.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 42.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 49.1%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 52.1%).
Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
21.5%

Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 95.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 86.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 84.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.6%).
Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
8.9%

Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.4%).
Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
75.1%

Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 71.6%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 64.1%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.45%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (63.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
49.8%

Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.2%).
Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 75.3%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 70.5%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 61.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 59.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.0%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.6%).
Brazilian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%