Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Mongolian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Mongolians

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Mongolian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,444,514 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.103% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to a decrease of 103.0 Tohono O'odham.
Mongolian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $30,256, a difference of 62.5%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $72,193, a difference of 58.7%), and median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $39,543, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $45,248, a difference of 16.1%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $33,205, a difference of 28.1%).
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricMongolianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,173
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,553
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,971
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,038
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,350
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,542
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,540
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,578
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,602
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,326
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Exceptional
22.1%

Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 137.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 123.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 43.5%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 44.3%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 55.6%).
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricMongolianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Average
12.4%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
21.5%

Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 102.8%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 97.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 96.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.6%).
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMongolianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.9%

Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.8%).
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMongolianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
75.1%

Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 86.3%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 78.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMongolianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
49.8%

Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 19.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMongolianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.1%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 115.6%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 99.9%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 89.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricMongolianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.8%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
89.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.0%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 65.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 22.4%).
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricMongolianTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%