Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Mongolian
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Mongolians
Tohono O'odham
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Mongolian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,444,514 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.103% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to a decrease of 103.0 Tohono O'odham.
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $30,256, a difference of 62.5%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $72,193, a difference of 58.7%), and median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $39,543, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $45,248, a difference of 16.1%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $33,205, a difference of 28.1%).
Income Metric | Mongolian | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,173 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,553 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,971 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,038 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,350 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,542 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,540 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,578 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,602 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,326 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 137.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 123.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 43.5%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 44.3%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 55.6%).
Poverty Metric | Mongolian | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 102.8%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 97.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 96.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Mongolian | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Mongolian | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 75.1% |
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 86.3%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 78.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Mongolian | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 49.8% |
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 19.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Mongolian | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.0% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.1% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 6.6% |
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 115.6%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 99.9%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 89.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Mongolian | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 93.0% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.8% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 89.9% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.0% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Mongolian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 65.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 22.4%).
Disability Metric | Mongolian | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.1% |