Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Tohono O'odham

Excellent
Tragic
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,977,419 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.959. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.350% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 349.6 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $30,256, a difference of 71.1%), median family income ($116,165 compared to $72,193, a difference of 60.9%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $39,543, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $45,248, a difference of 20.1%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $33,205, a difference of 31.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 166.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 144.8%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 128.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 35.9%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 57.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 62.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 99.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 92.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 87.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 88.0%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 75.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%), family households (63.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 104.5%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 91.1%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 80.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 82.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 71.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.8%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%