Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sub-Saharan Africans

Tohono O'odham

Tragic
Tragic
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,103,472 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Tohono O'odham.
Subsaharan African Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,152 compared to $30,256, a difference of 32.7%), median family income ($93,748 compared to $72,193, a difference of 29.9%), and median male earnings ($50,408 compared to $39,543, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $45,248, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $49,121, a difference of 15.3%).
Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricSubsaharan AfricanTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,152
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,748
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,631
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,118
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,408
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,391
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,691
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,235
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,691
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,615
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Exceptional
22.1%

Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 98.0%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 87.9%), and male poverty (13.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 30.0%), single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 37.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 40.8%).
Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricSubsaharan AfricanTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
23.2%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
21.5%

Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 87.5%), male unemployment (6.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 70.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSubsaharan AfricanTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.9%

Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSubsaharan AfricanTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.7%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
75.1%

Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 56.6%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 36.0%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSubsaharan AfricanTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
49.8%

Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSubsaharan AfricanTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.9%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
6.6%

Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 46.7%), bachelor's degree (35.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 46.6%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricSubsaharan AfricanTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.3%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.8%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 67.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Subsaharan African vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricSubsaharan AfricanTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%