Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Filipinos

Tohono O'odham

Exceptional
Tragic
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Filipino Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,023,795 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 13.5 Tohono O'odham.
Filipino Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $30,256, a difference of 95.2%), median family income ($138,397 compared to $72,193, a difference of 91.7%), and median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $39,543, a difference of 87.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $45,248, a difference of 27.6%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 34.1%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $33,205, a difference of 49.1%).
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricFilipinoTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$59,066
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$138,397
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$115,509
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$61,197
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,224
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,508
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,740
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,723
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$134,910
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$76,686
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
22.1%

Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 206.8%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 190.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 184.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 56.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 63.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 67.4%).
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricFilipinoTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
21.5%

Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 114.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 108.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 104.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.3%).
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFilipinoTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.9%

Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.6%).
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFilipinoTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.4%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
75.1%

Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 116.9%), single father households (1.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 112.0%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 94.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.53, a difference of 10.4%).
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFilipinoTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.0%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
49.8%

Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFilipinoTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 165.7%), master's degree (23.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 141.2%), and doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 135.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricFilipinoTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.5%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
75.5%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
59.8%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
52.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
23.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 108.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 107.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.9%).
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricFilipinoTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%