Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Filipino
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Filipinos
Tohono O'odham
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Filipino Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,023,795 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 13.5 Tohono O'odham.
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $30,256, a difference of 95.2%), median family income ($138,397 compared to $72,193, a difference of 91.7%), and median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $39,543, a difference of 87.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $45,248, a difference of 27.6%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 34.1%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $33,205, a difference of 49.1%).
Income Metric | Filipino | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $59,066 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $138,397 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $115,509 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $61,197 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $74,224 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $49,508 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,740 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $128,723 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $134,910 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $76,686 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 206.8%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 190.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 184.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 56.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 63.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 67.4%).
Poverty Metric | Filipino | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.3% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 114.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 108.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 104.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Filipino | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.9% |
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Filipino | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.7% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.4% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 75.1% |
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 116.9%), single father households (1.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 112.0%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 94.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.53, a difference of 10.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Filipino | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 51.0% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 23.0% | Tragic 49.8% |
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Filipino | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.7% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.8% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Excellent 6.6% |
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 165.7%), master's degree (23.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 141.2%), and doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 135.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Filipino | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.5% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 75.5% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 71.0% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 59.8% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 52.7% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 23.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Filipino vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 108.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 107.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.9%).
Disability Metric | Filipino | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.1% |