Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Tohono O'odham

Exceptional
Tragic
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,632,259 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($125,956 compared to $72,193, a difference of 74.5%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $39,543, a difference of 74.4%), and per capita income ($52,660 compared to $30,256, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $45,248, a difference of 27.8%), wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 32.4%), and median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $33,205, a difference of 39.5%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,660
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,956
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$106,057
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$57,114
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$68,960
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,324
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,818
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$116,626
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$124,188
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,103
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.3%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 183.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 160.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 153.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 51.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 68.3%), and single mother poverty (25.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 70.4%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.6%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 113.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 105.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 103.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.6%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 102.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 94.6%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.53, a difference of 9.4%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 82.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 113.4%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 107.3%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 98.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
72.1%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.7%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 112.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 89.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.6%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%