Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Soviet Union

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Soviet Union Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,680,095 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.260% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to a decrease of 260.3 Tohono O'odham.
Soviet Union Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $30,256, a difference of 79.1%), median family income ($119,262 compared to $72,193, a difference of 65.2%), and median male earnings ($63,382 compared to $39,543, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 9.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,340 compared to $45,248, a difference of 22.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $49,121, a difference of 28.0%).
Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricSoviet UnionTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,202
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,262
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,098
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,290
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,382
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,556
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,340
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,457
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,008
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,848
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.2%
Exceptional
22.1%

Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 144.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 130.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 32.3%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 54.4%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 57.4%).
Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricSoviet UnionTohono O'odham
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
21.5%

Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 95.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 94.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.8%).
Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSoviet UnionTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.9%

Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.9%).
Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSoviet UnionTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
75.1%

Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 113.0%), births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 89.5%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.8%), family households (60.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and family households with children (24.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 12.7%).
Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSoviet UnionTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
24.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.3%
Tragic
49.8%

Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.6%).
Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSoviet UnionTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
82.7%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.7%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 130.7%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 111.5%), and bachelor's degree (47.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 96.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricSoviet UnionTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.1%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.1%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 131.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 81.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.6%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.5%).
Soviet Union vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricSoviet UnionTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%