Ugandan vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ugandan
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ugandans
Tohono O'odham
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Ugandan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,076,393 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.174% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 5,173.6 Tohono O'odham.
Ugandan vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,047 compared to $30,256, a difference of 48.9%), median family income ($106,541 compared to $72,193, a difference of 47.6%), and median household income ($87,557 compared to $61,663, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $45,248, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $33,205, a difference of 23.1%).
Income Metric | Ugandan | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,047 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,541 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,557 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,854 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,290 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,889 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,923 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,667 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,472 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,177 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.1% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Ugandan vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 119.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 110.3%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 87.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 35.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 49.2%).
Poverty Metric | Ugandan | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.3% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 11.9% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 21.5% |
Ugandan vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 102.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 100.3%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 84.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Ugandan | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 8.9% |
Ugandan vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ugandan | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.6% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 75.1% |
Ugandan vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 65.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 65.0%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (61.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 8.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Ugandan | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Tragic 61.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.1% | Tragic 49.8% |
Ugandan vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ugandan | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 6.6% |
Ugandan vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 79.7%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 76.5%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Ugandan | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Average 97.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.2% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Ugandan vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 92.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 58.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Disability Metric | Ugandan | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.1% |