Romanian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Romanian
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Romanians
Tohono O'odham
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Romanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,425,746 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.411. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to a decrease of 20.3 Tohono O'odham.
Romanian vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $30,256, a difference of 60.1%), median family income ($111,243 compared to $72,193, a difference of 54.1%), and median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $39,543, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $45,248, a difference of 18.5%), median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $33,205, a difference of 25.5%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 26.2%).
Income Metric | Romanian | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,445 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,243 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,994 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,244 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,063 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,663 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,632 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,544 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,609 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,142 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Romanian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 150.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 131.9%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 119.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 33.0%), single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 63.3%).
Poverty Metric | Romanian | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Romanian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 98.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 96.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Romanian | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.9% |
Romanian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Romanian | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 75.1% |
Romanian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 80.2%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 73.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Romanian | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 49.8% |
Romanian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Romanian | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.5% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Excellent 6.6% |
Romanian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 85.6%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 76.9%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Education Level Metric | Romanian | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.6% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Romanian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 71.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 63.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.7%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.5%).
Disability Metric | Romanian | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.6% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |