Hmong vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,711,549 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.198% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 198.3 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($91,296 compared to $72,193, a difference of 26.5%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $30,256, a difference of 26.0%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $33,205, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $45,248, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $49,121, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 125.5%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 123.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 100.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 37.7%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 38.6%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 48.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 113.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 101.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 97.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 79.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 61.4%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 42.3%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 38.1%), and associate's degree (43.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 93.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.4%).