Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Tohono O'odham

Average
Tragic
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,265,729 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 68.9 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $30,256, a difference of 49.5%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $72,193, a difference of 47.5%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $61,663, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 15.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $45,248, a difference of 18.6%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $33,205, a difference of 21.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 133.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 123.4%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 104.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 42.5%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 50.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 57.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Good
8.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 98.9%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 90.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 21.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 63.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 55.5%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 60.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.5%), bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 53.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 88.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 50.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.3%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 18.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTohono O'odham
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%