Chilean vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Tohono O'odham
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,935,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.436% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 435.8 Tohono O'odham.
Chilean vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $30,256, a difference of 53.5%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $72,193, a difference of 50.2%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $61,663, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $45,248, a difference of 17.5%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $33,205, a difference of 22.7%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Chilean vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 141.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 127.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 40.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 51.4%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 54.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 21.5% |
Chilean vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 101.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 98.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 92.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 8.9% |
Chilean vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 75.1% |
Chilean vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 72.5%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 62.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and family households (65.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 49.8% |
Chilean vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 57.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chilean vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 84.7%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 74.5%), and bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chilean vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 70.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 63.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.0%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.1% |