Alaska Native vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,769,045 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 44.7 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,573 compared to $72,193, a difference of 32.4%), per capita income ($39,558 compared to $30,256, a difference of 30.7%), and median household income ($79,509 compared to $61,663, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 10.3%), median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $33,205, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $45,248, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 96.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 92.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.5%), receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 37.5%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 39.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 53.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 49.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 24.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 30.2%), currently married (45.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.2%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.53, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.6%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.2%), disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age over 75 (52.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 7.4%).