Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pakistanis

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Pakistani Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,194,837 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 141.9 Tohono O'odham.
Pakistani Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,587 compared to $30,256, a difference of 50.7%), median family income ($107,390 compared to $72,193, a difference of 48.7%), and median household income ($89,638 compared to $61,663, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,325 compared to $45,248, a difference of 17.8%), and median female earnings ($40,596 compared to $33,205, a difference of 22.3%).
Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricPakistaniTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,587
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,390
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,638
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,254
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,719
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,596
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,325
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,401
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,317
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,844
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.1%
Exceptional
22.1%

Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 144.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 137.2%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 112.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 39.9%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 53.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 56.3%).
Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricPakistaniTohono O'odham
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
21.5%

Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 97.7%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 96.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.3%).
Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPakistaniTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%

Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPakistaniTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.6%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Tragic
75.1%

Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 66.2%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 63.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.29%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and family households (64.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPakistaniTohono O'odham
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
49.8%

Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 74.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.6%).
Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPakistaniTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
6.6%

Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 67.7%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 62.7%), and bachelor's degree (39.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricPakistaniTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.5%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.1%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 70.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 55.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 19.0%).
Pakistani vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricPakistaniTohono O'odham
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%