Swiss vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Swiss
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Swiss
Tohono O'odham
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Swiss Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,393,568 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.336% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 336.2 Tohono O'odham.
Swiss vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,076 compared to $30,256, a difference of 45.7%), median family income ($104,396 compared to $72,193, a difference of 44.6%), and median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $39,543, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $45,248, a difference of 13.8%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $33,205, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $49,121, a difference of 25.5%).
Income Metric | Swiss | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,076 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,396 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,681 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,315 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,731 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,904 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,493 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,511 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $103,071 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,621 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 30.0% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Swiss vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 164.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 161.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 126.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 44.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 53.8%).
Poverty Metric | Swiss | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Fair 21.4% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 21.5% |
Swiss vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 115.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 106.5%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Swiss | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.9% |
Swiss vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 38.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Swiss | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.7% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 75.1% |
Swiss vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 66.6%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 63.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (65.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Swiss | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 49.8% |
Swiss vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 98.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 21.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Swiss | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.0% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Excellent 6.6% |
Swiss vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.4%), bachelor's degree (37.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 52.4%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
Education Level Metric | Swiss | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.5% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.2% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.2% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Swiss vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 57.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 44.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.5%).
Disability Metric | Swiss | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |