Creek vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Creek

Tohono O'odham

Fair
Tragic
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Creek Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,763,513 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 10.3 Tohono O'odham.
Creek Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Creek vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 22.5%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $39,543, a difference of 17.8%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $30,256, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $45,248, a difference of 0.27%), median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $33,205, a difference of 0.70%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $49,121, a difference of 5.8%).
Creek vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricCreekTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,546
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,560
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,715
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,648
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,594
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,437
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,371
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,847
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$78,960
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,949
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
22.1%

Creek vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 90.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 81.8%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 75.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother poverty (36.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 21.8%).
Creek vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricCreekTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
21.5%

Creek vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 89.6%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 82.4%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 65.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.4%).
Creek vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCreekTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
8.9%

Creek vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 25.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.1%).
Creek vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCreekTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
75.1%

Creek vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 46.9%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 32.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (64.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.53, a difference of 10.4%).
Creek vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCreekTohono O'odham
Family Households
Fair
64.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.3%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Poor
46.0%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.4%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.6%
Tragic
49.8%

Creek vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 100.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.2%).
Creek vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCreekTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Creek vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.1%), associate's degree (37.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%).
Creek vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricCreekTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.2%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Creek vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.86%), ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and female disability (15.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Creek vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricCreekTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.1%