Laotian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Tohono O'odham
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,956,360 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 114.5 Tohono O'odham.
Laotian vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,859 compared to $72,193, a difference of 56.3%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $30,256, a difference of 55.5%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $61,663, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 19.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $45,248, a difference of 20.2%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $33,205, a difference of 26.9%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Laotian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 151.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 138.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 121.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 46.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 55.5%), and single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 59.7%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 21.5% |
Laotian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 94.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 94.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.9% |
Laotian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 75.1% |
Laotian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 75.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 71.4%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (65.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 49.8% |
Laotian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 72.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Laotian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 84.3%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 75.4%), and bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Laotian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 78.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 65.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 18.4%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |