Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slovak
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slovaks

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
6,550
SOCIAL INDEX
63.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
150th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Slovak Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,108,250 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 25.5 Tohono O'odham.
Slovak Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,229 compared to $30,256, a difference of 46.2%), median family income ($103,729 compared to $72,193, a difference of 43.7%), and median male earnings ($56,306 compared to $39,543, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $45,248, a difference of 10.0%), median female earnings ($39,029 compared to $33,205, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $49,121, a difference of 20.2%).
Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricSlovakTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,229
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Good
$103,729
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,798
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Good
$47,095
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,306
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$39,029
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,753
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,032
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$101,029
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,039
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.9%
Exceptional
22.1%

Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 178.8%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 158.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 127.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.1%), single mother poverty (30.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 41.5%), and single male poverty (14.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 52.9%).
Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricSlovakTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.6%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Fair
21.1%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
21.5%

Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 95.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 94.6%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.0%).
Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlovakTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%

Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 36.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 10.8%).
Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlovakTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.9%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.6%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.7%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
75.1%

Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 70.7%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 59.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.0%).
Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlovakTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.4%
Tragic
49.8%

Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 89.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%).
Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlovakTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Excellent
6.6%

Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 72.2%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 53.7%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricSlovakTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.5%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Average
14.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 60.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 38.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and female disability (13.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 12.4%).
Slovak vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricSlovakTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.8%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%