Asian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,185,388 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($119,955 compared to $72,193, a difference of 66.2%), per capita income ($50,057 compared to $30,256, a difference of 65.4%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $61,663, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 21.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $45,248, a difference of 26.0%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $33,205, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 163.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 140.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 135.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 51.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 59.4%), and single mother poverty (26.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 65.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 99.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 97.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 92.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 86.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 82.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.53, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 74.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 93.6%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 90.0%), and bachelor's degree (44.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 101.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 78.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.1%).