Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Tohono O'odham
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,129,191 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Tohono O'odham.
Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 23.8%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $39,543, a difference of 23.1%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $30,256, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $33,205, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $45,248, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $49,121, a difference of 10.2%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 94.7%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 92.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 90.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 33.3%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 21.5% |
Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 86.5%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 82.1%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 6.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 75.1% |
Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.53, a difference of 11.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 49.8% |
Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 101.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 19.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Excellent 6.6% |
Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.9%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and associate's degree (38.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.51%), female disability (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.95%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.1% |