Australian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,594,697 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.774. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.267% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 267.5 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $30,256, a difference of 72.1%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $72,193, a difference of 64.1%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $39,543, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $45,248, a difference of 18.8%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 27.2%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $33,205, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 160.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 160.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 123.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 40.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 52.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 102.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 93.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 89.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 75.7%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 68.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (62.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 54.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 106.9%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 89.5%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 63.6%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.8%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.3%).