Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Egyptian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Egyptians

Tohono O'odham

Excellent
Tragic
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Egyptian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,944,673 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 5.8 Tohono O'odham.
Egyptian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,358 compared to $30,256, a difference of 59.8%), median family income ($114,119 compared to $72,193, a difference of 58.1%), and median household income ($95,673 compared to $61,663, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 20.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $45,248, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($43,305 compared to $33,205, a difference of 30.4%).
Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricEgyptianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,358
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,119
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,673
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,701
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,095
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,305
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,444
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,282
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,256
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,441
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Exceptional
22.1%

Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 150.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 131.4%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 121.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 50.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 57.6%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 59.9%).
Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricEgyptianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
21.5%

Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 98.5%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 95.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 89.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.8%).
Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEgyptianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%

Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.8%).
Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEgyptianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
75.1%

Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 84.9%), births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 76.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (65.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEgyptianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
65.4%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.2%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
49.8%

Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 31.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEgyptianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.2%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 84.7%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 81.4%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 77.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricEgyptianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
89.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.1%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 96.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 72.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.5%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.4%).
Egyptian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricEgyptianTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%