Cuban vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,241,933 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 11.7 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,383 compared to $30,256, a difference of 23.5%), median household income ($73,392 compared to $61,663, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,483 compared to $69,068, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $49,121, a difference of 0.060%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $33,205, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 91.8%), male poverty (12.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 84.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 80.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.6%), receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 120.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 119.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 104.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 47.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.92%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.53, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 83.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.3%), bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and associate's degree (41.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%), 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 75.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 67.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.0%).