Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scottish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scottish

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Scottish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,651,394 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.622. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 52.9 Tohono O'odham.
Scottish Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,440 compared to $30,256, a difference of 46.9%), median family income ($104,288 compared to $72,193, a difference of 44.5%), and median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $39,543, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $45,248, a difference of 11.7%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $33,205, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $49,121, a difference of 25.7%).
Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricScottishTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,440
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Good
$104,288
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Average
$85,101
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Average
$46,463
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,793
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,397
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,554
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,622
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,123
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,735
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
22.1%

Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 163.0%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 156.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 127.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.0%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 48.7%).
Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricScottishTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.1%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
21.5%

Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 111.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 105.3%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 90.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.1%).
Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScottishTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.9%

Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 34.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.4%).
Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScottishTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.9%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
75.1%

Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 66.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 58.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.6%), family households (64.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScottishTohono O'odham
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.2%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Tragic
49.8%

Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 131.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 20.0%).
Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScottishTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.2%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 63.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.1%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.81%).
Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricScottishTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.0%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.5%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.1%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 52.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.5%).
Scottish vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricScottishTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%