Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Tohono O'odham

Average
Tragic
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,502,922 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Tohono O'odham.
Celtic Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $30,256, a difference of 44.2%), median family income ($101,139 compared to $72,193, a difference of 40.1%), and median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $39,543, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $45,248, a difference of 11.5%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $33,205, a difference of 15.3%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 23.1%).
Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricCelticTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.1%

Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 134.8%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 131.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 112.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 39.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 43.6%).
Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticTohono O'odham
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
21.5%

Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 103.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 99.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.6%).
Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
8.9%

Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 32.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.2%).
Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
75.1%

Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 64.2%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 49.7%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.2%), family households (63.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.8%).
Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
49.8%

Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 93.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.9%).
Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 54.3%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 52.0%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%).
Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.9%).
Celtic vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricCelticTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%