Chickasaw vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Tohono O'odham
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,326,889 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.267% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 266.8 Tohono O'odham.
Chickasaw vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 22.7%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $39,543, a difference of 21.0%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $30,256, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,248, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $33,205, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $49,121, a difference of 9.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Chickasaw vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 95.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 93.8%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.1%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 26.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Chickasaw vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 96.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 94.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 8.9% |
Chickasaw vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 75.1% |
Chickasaw vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.9%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 37.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.76%), family households (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.53, a difference of 10.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 49.8% |
Chickasaw vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 98.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chickasaw vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.4%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (15.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and male disability (15.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.1% |