South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

South American Indians

Tohono O'odham

Average
Tragic
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in South American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,845,372 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 53.9 Tohono O'odham.
South American Indian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $30,256, a difference of 46.1%), median family income ($103,624 compared to $72,193, a difference of 43.5%), and median household income ($87,446 compared to $61,663, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $45,248, a difference of 17.1%), and median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $33,205, a difference of 20.5%).
South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricSouth American IndianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,206
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Good
$103,624
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,446
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Good
$46,952
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,508
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,019
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,979
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,497
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,171
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,215
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
22.1%

South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 123.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 110.5%), and male poverty (11.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 98.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 40.1%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 48.4%).
South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricSouth American IndianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
21.5%

South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 97.9%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 85.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.8%).
South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSouth American IndianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
8.9%

South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 9.7%).
South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSouth American IndianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
75.1%

South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 69.9%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 57.0%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.15%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSouth American IndianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Tragic
49.8%

South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSouth American IndianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Excellent
6.6%

South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 67.1%), master's degree (15.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 63.7%), and bachelor's degree (39.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricSouth American IndianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.5%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 63.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 55.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.5%).
South American Indian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricSouth American IndianTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.1%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%