Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Cuba
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Cuba

Tohono O'odham

Fair
Tragic
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,461,653 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,910 compared to $30,256, a difference of 15.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $45,248, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,701 compared to $69,068, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $33,205, a difference of 0.26%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and median earnings ($38,426 compared to $36,349, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CubaTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,910
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$78,249
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$68,461
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,426
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$43,461
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,291
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,374
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,701
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,662
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$44,735
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 88.8%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 80.2%), and male poverty (12.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.2%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CubaTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Average
16.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.1%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 129.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 128.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 113.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.1%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CubaTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CubaTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.0%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 43.6%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.53, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CubaTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.2%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
15.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 79.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 10.6%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CubaTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.3%), associate's degree (39.5% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 9th grade (92.2% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CubaTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.1%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.2%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.7%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.5%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 73.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.7%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.9%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CubaTohono O'odham
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.1%