Salvadoran vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Salvadoran
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Salvadorans

New Zealanders

Fair
Excellent
2,588
SOCIAL INDEX
23.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
250th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Salvadoran Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,905,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Salvadoran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Salvadorans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Salvadorans corresponds to an increase of 1.1 New Zealanders.
Salvadoran Integration in New Zealander Communities

Salvadoran vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,858 compared to $50,575, a difference of 30.1%), median male earnings ($48,646 compared to $61,199, a difference of 25.8%), and median family income ($94,109 compared to $115,230, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,412 compared to $53,294, a difference of 4.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,141 compared to $67,333, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($37,083 compared to $42,446, a difference of 14.5%).
Salvadoran vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricSalvadoranNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,858
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,109
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,449
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,912
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,646
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,083
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,412
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,198
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,842
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,141
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
27.7%

Salvadoran vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 46.7%), receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.6%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Salvadoran vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricSalvadoranNew Zealander
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.5%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.9%

Salvadoran vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.2%).
Salvadoran vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSalvadoranNew Zealander
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.3%

Salvadoran vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Salvadoran vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSalvadoranNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Fair
82.6%

Salvadoran vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.2%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (44.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households (67.2% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 6.8%).
Salvadoran vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSalvadoranNew Zealander
Family Households
Exceptional
67.2%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.9%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.7%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.48
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.5%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.0%
Excellent
30.3%

Salvadoran vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Salvadoran vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSalvadoranNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.3%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Good
6.5%

Salvadoran vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 124.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 69.6%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Salvadoran vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricSalvadoranNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.5%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.3%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.8%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.5%

Salvadoran vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Salvadoran vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricSalvadoranNew Zealander
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.0%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.9%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%