Mongolian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,167,900 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.449. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.139% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 138.6 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $67,333, a difference of 3.1%), and per capita income ($49,173 compared to $50,575, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $42,446, a difference of 0.23%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $111,286, a difference of 0.28%), and median earnings ($51,038 compared to $51,246, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.7%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.43%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.7%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.7%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.40%), college, under 1 year (69.9% compared to 70.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.36%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.8%).