Latvian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,009,019 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 93.3 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,301 compared to $115,230, a difference of 4.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $111,286, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($52,649 compared to $50,575, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $67,333, a difference of 0.010%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.4%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.31%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.4%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.31%).