Israeli vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,086,559 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to an increase of 61.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,596 compared to $50,575, a difference of 4.0%), median male earnings ($63,228 compared to $61,199, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($43,852 compared to $42,446, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $67,333, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($96,552 compared to $95,146, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.22%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.39%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.0%), no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.2% compared to 70.2%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.51%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.8%).