Brazilian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

New Zealanders

Good
Excellent
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,751,970 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 0.6 New Zealanders.
Brazilian Integration in New Zealander Communities

Brazilian vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $67,333, a difference of 9.6%), per capita income ($46,700 compared to $50,575, a difference of 8.3%), and median family income ($106,942 compared to $115,230, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $53,294, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $42,446, a difference of 4.9%).
Brazilian vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricBrazilianNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Brazilian vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Brazilian vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianNew Zealander
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
9.9%

Brazilian vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Brazilian vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianNew Zealander
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%

Brazilian vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.72%).
Brazilian vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Fair
82.6%

Brazilian vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.94%), and family households (63.9% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Brazilian vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianNew Zealander
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Excellent
30.3%

Brazilian vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Brazilian vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Good
6.5%

Brazilian vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Brazilian vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.5%

Brazilian vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.59%).
Brazilian vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianNew Zealander
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%