Mexican American Indian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,269,333 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.726. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 50.0 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $50,575, a difference of 35.2%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $61,199, a difference of 27.5%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $115,230, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $53,294, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $42,446, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 44.2%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 38.7%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 90.7%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 82.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 81.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.7%), male disability (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.9%).