Scottish vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,897,306 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.151% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 151.0 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,440 compared to $50,575, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($85,101 compared to $95,146, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $105,085, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $53,294, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $111,286, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.47%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.8%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 50.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.1%).