Kiowa vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Kiowa

New Zealanders

Poor
Excellent
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Kiowa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,971,644 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.887. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 55.4 New Zealanders.
Kiowa Integration in New Zealander Communities

Kiowa vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $111,286, a difference of 48.7%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $95,146, a difference of 44.4%), and per capita income ($35,102 compared to $50,575, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 17.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $53,294, a difference of 19.1%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $42,446, a difference of 24.6%).
Kiowa vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricKiowaNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,102
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Tragic
$80,885
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,914
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,232
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,094
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,074
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,733
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,776
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,815
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,140
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
27.7%

Kiowa vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.3%), family poverty (12.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 51.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.1%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.6%).
Kiowa vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricKiowaNew Zealander
Poverty
Tragic
16.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.7%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.5%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
18.3%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.9%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.5%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.5%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.9%

Kiowa vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 50.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
Kiowa vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricKiowaNew Zealander
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.3%

Kiowa vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Kiowa vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricKiowaNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.2%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Fair
82.6%

Kiowa vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 42.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.4%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.55%), family households (61.4% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.7%).
Kiowa vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricKiowaNew Zealander
Family Households
Tragic
61.4%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
43.1%
Excellent
30.3%

Kiowa vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Kiowa vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricKiowaNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.5%

Kiowa vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 93.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 69.4%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%).
Kiowa vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricKiowaNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.8%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.5%

Kiowa vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 58.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.4%).
Kiowa vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricKiowaNew Zealander
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.4%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.6%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%