Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

New Zealanders

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,346,656 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 12.0 New Zealanders.
Tohono O'odham Integration in New Zealander Communities

Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $50,575, a difference of 67.2%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $115,230, a difference of 59.6%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $61,199, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $53,294, a difference of 17.8%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $42,446, a difference of 27.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.7%

Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 152.3%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 152.2%), and receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 116.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 42.9%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 47.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamNew Zealander
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.9%

Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 102.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 100.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamNew Zealander
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.3%

Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Fair
82.6%

Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 82.9%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 64.3%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (67.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 6.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamNew Zealander
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Excellent
30.3%

Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 53.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.5%

Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 109.3%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 88.3%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.56%).
Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.5%

Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 82.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 57.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamNew Zealander
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%