Slavic vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

New Zealanders

Good
Excellent
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,488,232 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.459% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 1,458.8 New Zealanders.
Slavic Integration in New Zealander Communities

Slavic vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $50,575, a difference of 12.3%), median household income ($86,398 compared to $95,146, a difference of 10.1%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $115,230, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $53,294, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $42,446, a difference of 7.1%).
Slavic vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricSlavicNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.7%

Slavic vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 10.2%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
Slavic vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicNew Zealander
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Slavic vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
Slavic vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicNew Zealander
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Good
5.3%

Slavic vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Slavic vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Fair
82.6%

Slavic vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.5%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.80%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Slavic vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicNew Zealander
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Excellent
30.3%

Slavic vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.20%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Slavic vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.5%

Slavic vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.9%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%).
Slavic vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.5%

Slavic vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Slavic vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricSlavicNew Zealander
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%