Immigrants from Africa vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,534,990 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 1.2 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.6%), per capita income ($42,950 compared to $50,575, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $105,085, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $53,294, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $42,446, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($46,564 compared to $51,246, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.7%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.9%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.80%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.25%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%).